Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Brosiery: No, Just No.

Look, I’m all for the modern man.  You like opera?  Cool, Niles.  Fancy museums?  Who doesn’t, Frasier?  But this just screams ridiculous. 

Apparently, pantyhose for men is a growing trend. Designer Emilio Cavallini designed a line of unisex tights, and they’re being snatched up by men.

Please, tell me how any woman could seriously go all ooh-ooh, ahh-ahh with a man wearing these.  I’m sorry, but if he revealed these under his pants, I’d burst out laughing, tears, snorts, gags and all. 

I can tell you, if this is in fact a growing trend, then I’m going to be a virgin forever because there’s no way my cherry’s gettin’ popped by a man wearing mantyhose.  Mantyhose?! Good friggin’ grief! 

Credit: Emilio Cavallini





Credit: Emilio Cavallini



So, what do you think? Check box “Sexy,” box “Um, huh?” or box “Hell no.”



34 comments:

  1. Hell no!

    What are they THINKING?

    ReplyDelete
  2. They ought to be called nut-squeezers, Miss Virgin. Even if you did get your cherry popped, you wouldn't be popping out any babies.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hell no I couldn't look at a man with a straight face if he was wearing these and really would even a gay man want to wear them ok some gay men might but honestly what the hell............

    Oh and I am your latest follower I got sent here from Jewels blog and for the love of me I do not understand why I wasn't following you earlier.....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seriously.

      I don't think I know or knew any gay men who would wear them...maybe one, actually, but still not sure.

      I'm so glad! I will jump over to your blog and follow you as well. *Hugs*

      Delete
  4. Hell no! Those are awful lol! It's as bad as men wearing UGG boots!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL! Wait, men wear Ugg boots?! Oh. No. No, no. lol

      Delete
  5. Hell no! Modern man yes, but that...NO!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL--I kinda figured this was a little much for the modern man.

      Delete
  6. Hell no. Those are fugly. Women are finally getting away with not wearing pantyhose. They're tight and annoying and a pain to get out of the way when you need to pee big time. Why would men want to start doing something that women hate?

    Love,
    Janie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You know, when I go on a date, I'll now be checking his feet/ankles when we sit down, just to see if any of these are peeking out. lol

      Delete
  7. Replies
    1. LOL! My eyes were the size of plates when I saw them. lol

      Delete
  8. I'd be asking him where is the rest of his "Jester" outfit.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm laughing because Bonus Brother needs a costume for Anime Boston, and wants to go as Link from Zelda. Where in he needs a pair of white tights.

    And here I was thinking this would be an issue.

    *chuckles* Now where's the link to the web site?

    But I must say that Tony doesn't even like me wearing pantyhose, so if he came home wanting tummy control and sandal foot toes for himself, I'd take issue. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL--well, no longer a problem, for sure!!! Can you imagine getting these for Tony as a gag gift or something?! LOL

      Delete
    2. Could you imagine that if I bought them he'd most likely wear them just to call my bluff? :)

      Delete
    3. LOL--You think he would?! lol That would be a moment! lol

      Delete
  10. That would be a "hell, no"...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seems to be the consensus. Kinda makes me wonder where these trend-making men are. lol

      Delete
  11. Hell no! That is probably the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen designed for men. If I ever see any man wearing those, I will glare at him until he leaves to take them off. This better not become a huge fashion trend.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL--How hilarious would "the glare" be?! lol If it becomes a huge fashion trend, I'm officially calling it quits. lol

      Delete
  12. Not just "hell no", but "HELL TO THE NO!" ---I think that is one of the most ridiculous things ever. And um, yeah, if someone I was going out with told me or showed me the hose, I would laugh me head off and then leave. hahaha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HA! Hell to the no! Yeah, you know I'm going to be watching the guy's cuffs now for a hint of hose. lol Lord help us all if I see star-covered tights! lol

      Delete
  13. Robin Hood wore them! And Henry the VIII and Joe Namath (well at least on a centrefold)! Are these to be worn with skirts or under their jeans?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll give historical figures and literary/film characters a pass. lol Yeah, I'm guessing they're supposed to be under pants?? Maybe in place of socks?? No idea.

      Delete
  14. What in the name of all that is good and sacred are those!? I've never heard or seen such a thing! I wish my brain had a "delete" button. Those are horrific!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL LOL LOL--Yeah, I did the whole jaw-drop, wide eyes thing. Glad I'm not the only one who doesn't get it.

      Delete
  15. Hello NO Mantyhose! Um, these people DO realize what century they are in, right? Because I'm surprised any man ever got laid when tights WERE the fashion several hundred years ago - WHEN THEY DIDN'T KNOW ANY BETTER. I am soooo glad I now live in an area that NONE of the men would actually be caught dead wearing those.

    Now, you'll have to excuse me . . . I need to go request an eye transplant because I can't unsee that sh*t.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seriously, I'm laughing my bum off over here!!! The only tight pants I want to see on a man is of the football variety while on the field.

      Delete